A straddle involves buying (or selling) both a call and a put option at the same strike price and same expiration.
Breakevens:
Tighter breakevens than a strangle.
The stock price only needs to move beyond the strike price ± the total premium paid to reach breakeven.
Potential Loss:
Higher potential loss because straddles generally cost more (both options are closer to the current stock price and thus more expensive).
Pros:
More responsive to smaller moves: The stock doesn’t have to move as much to start making a profit.
Stronger reaction to volatility: Better for situations where a big move (up or down) is expected soon.
Cons:
Higher cost: Because both options are closer to the stock price, they are more expensive.
More loss potential if the stock stays near the strike price, as the premium paid can be high.
A strangle involves buying (or selling) a call and a put option at different strike prices (out-of-the-money), but with the same expiration.
Breakevens:
Wider breakevens than a straddle, as the stock has to move more to hit the strike prices.
Potential Loss:
Lower potential loss compared to a straddle because the options are cheaper (further from the current stock price).
Pros:
Lower cost: Because both options are out-of-the-money, they’re cheaper.
Less risk of loss if the stock doesn’t move far.
Cons:
Needs a bigger move to profit: The stock must move more to hit the breakeven points.
Slower to react to price movement: Gains may be smaller unless there’s a substantial price change.
Strategy
Tighter Breakevens
Higher Potential Loss
Pros
Cons
Straddle
Yes
Yes
Good for expected big moves; More responsive
High cost; More loss if stock stays near strike
Strangle
No
No
Lower cost; Less risk if stock doesn't move far
Needs bigger move; Slower to profit
In short:
Use a Straddle if you expect a significant price movement and want a tighter breakeven.
Use a Strangle if you expect a large move but want to reduce the cost and potential losses.